<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: three good things</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.logicalrealism.org/2009/07/20/three-good-things/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.logicalrealism.org/2009/07/20/three-good-things/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 01:02:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://blog.logicalrealism.org/2009/07/20/three-good-things/comment-page-1/#comment-39366</link>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.logicalrealism.org/?p=147#comment-39366</guid>
		<description>Hi Leanne - we have not quite had enough participants for meaningful results over the long term. For the data we do have, we see modest (and significantly significant) improvements the CES-D and AHI scales after one week and after one month of use. The trends are also encouraging at 3 months.

There are some issues with this, though: first, we don&#039;t have a comparison to a set of participants who are using a purely private version. Second, it&#039;s reasonable to think that people will look for this application when they are fairly unhappy, and thus we would see some improvement over time anyway *and* people who do not become happier (for whatever reasons) are probably more likely to quit and move on to try other activities, since 3GT isn&#039;t working for them.

I&#039;m hoping to get some time to make improvements to 3GT and to then do a long-term comparison with a paper version and with a personal (i.e., not social) but still electronic version, using random assignment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Leanne &#8211; we have not quite had enough participants for meaningful results over the long term. For the data we do have, we see modest (and significantly significant) improvements the CES-D and AHI scales after one week and after one month of use. The trends are also encouraging at 3 months.</p>
<p>There are some issues with this, though: first, we don&#8217;t have a comparison to a set of participants who are using a purely private version. Second, it&#8217;s reasonable to think that people will look for this application when they are fairly unhappy, and thus we would see some improvement over time anyway *and* people who do not become happier (for whatever reasons) are probably more likely to quit and move on to try other activities, since 3GT isn&#8217;t working for them.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m hoping to get some time to make improvements to 3GT and to then do a long-term comparison with a paper version and with a personal (i.e., not social) but still electronic version, using random assignment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leeanne Mc Sharry</title>
		<link>http://blog.logicalrealism.org/2009/07/20/three-good-things/comment-page-1/#comment-39238</link>
		<dc:creator>Leeanne Mc Sharry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 14:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.logicalrealism.org/?p=147#comment-39238</guid>
		<description>Hi,

i am just completing a write up of a three good things task and was wondering what sort of results you got from your facebook group on the mood changes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>i am just completing a write up of a three good things task and was wondering what sort of results you got from your facebook group on the mood changes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.342 seconds -->

